[andybak]

Actually, not when you factor in the need to serve unpopular routes and non-Busyntimes. That's a lot of trains and buses running nearly empty.

Small, on-demand personalised mass transit has the potential to be the most efficient transport system.

[thrownaway2424]

That's really just a negative externality of inefficient suburban development. If the 'burbs didn't exist in the first place, there would be no need to subsidize their barely-used mass transit services.

[sien]

The Farebox recovery ratio even for big European cities is well below recovery rates for mass transport.

Only a few Asian cities get more than their public transport systems cost to run back. This page has more info:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farebox_recovery_ratio

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farebox_recovery_ratio

[andybak]

"That's really just a negative externality of inefficient suburban development." Shouldn't public transit cover rural areas and small towns also? Or is the only way to get an efficient transport system to have the entire world living in huge urban centres? Personal mass transit could allow a much wider range of city sizes to be served with relative efficiency.

[thrownaway2424]

Mass transit doesn't need "huge urban centers" and indeed can and does serve cities of all sizes. What it requires, though, is a minimum density. You can't serve a small, sprawling city. You can easily serve small, compact cities. Compare, for example, the transit effectiveness between Zurich and Tulsa, cities of comparable population.

[lallysingh]

Especially if you can finally get high-occupancy vehicles right. Something closer to a 6-passenger vehicle with bus-style seating... if we're very lucky, only with people at most one indirect hop away in your social network?

[coopdog]

Or smaller vehicles driving inches apart to get into the slip stream, I imagine that has the potential to be quite efficient (and flexible) too