|
|
|
|
|
by v1ne
439 days ago
|
|
The question is: Who is the beneficiary of the app sandbox?
Is it you, the user, because no malicious processes can taper with your apps?
Or is it the corporations, because they prevent you from modifying their apps – which makes you a pure consumer? I think, for the tech-savvy, the latter is more accurate and I think it is very important to be able to crack open these sandboxes and tinker with processes. Be it to inject ad blockers, automate them, modify their appearance, etc. It should be a right of a user to be able to do these things. |
|
Malicious apps sneak through the vetting process all the time.
Genuine, honest apps have to process unsafe content (be it we pages, messages) all the time.
One exploit should at most make single App vulnerable, not expose everything I have on my phone.
Strong, restrictive sandboxing, memory and execution protections are the only safe way.
And how is destroying the sandboxing related to having more rights as a consumer? You could still patch and repack them in the way Lucky Patcher does with ads, for example?