[JadeNB]

> If this isn't monetized, is there any reason against opening its source? I personally would like to be able to disable the usage analytics and crash reports.

Although I personally deplore it and try to stay away from software that requires it, or even opts me in, I nonetheless think that it's reasonable for a developer to impose telemetry as a requirement for people to make use of their freely available software.

[prophesi]

The first thing I'd do if it were open source is spin up a PR to allow the telemetry to be opt-in. After two decades of being the product, it's hard to trust any data collection done by companies outside the EU.

[HeatrayEnjoyer]

As long as it's opt-in, sure. Otherwise it's be an illegal GDPR breach.

[rockemsockem]

Pretty sure if they just don't you use the software without opting in then it isn't a GDPR breach... You aren't entitled to use the software.

[47282847]

GDPR is very clear about how you are not allowed to make data collection a requirement for use.

It is a straightforward set of rules written in simple language and it’s not very long either. It’s not necessary to rely on third party readings or interpretations of it. Just go ahead and read it yourself and you will be well equipped to apply and argue about it.

[phkahler]

But then you could not allow access from the EU.

[rockemsockem]

Except I can just deny all of Europe access? Then anyone who wants to use it has to pretend to not be European through a VPN or otherwise.

[rockemsockem]

You can argue specifics and nitpick, but the outcome is effectively the same.

[quotemstr]

> GDPR is very clear about how you are not allowed to make data collection a requirement for use.

Everyone --- even German newspapers --- flouts this rule. "Consent or pay" is a common strategy.

[47282847]

And they keep losing in courts about it.