[DiogenesKynikos]

> Source for such claims please?

There have been many such cases in the news recently: Mahmoud Khalil, Rumeysa Ozturk, Yunseo Chung, Momodou Taal...

According to US Sectary of State Marco Rubio, the Trump administration is currently seeking to deport over 300 students, purely for criticizing Israel. None of them has been accused of any crime. The Trump administration calls anyone who protests against Israel a Hamas supporter and terrorist, cancels their visa, and tries to deport them.

[FirmwareBurner]

>There have been many such cases in the news recently: Mahmoud Khalil, Rumeysa Ozturk, Yunseo Chung, Momodou Taal...

Coming to a country to incite domestic terrorism or vocally support terrorist groups, gets you in trouble with the law in any country.

If you move to Germany/France/etc and occupy a university campus in support of Palestine, the police will drag you away and you will get deported.

[DiogenesKynikos]

None of them did anything even remotely similar to "inciting domestic terrorism" or "vocally support[ing] terrorist groups" (though the latter would actually be protected by the 1st Amendment).

If they had been in any way involved with domestic terrorism, then they could be charged, sentenced, and probably deported as a consequence. But what they actually did was peacefully protest, write Op-Eds, and generally speak their minds. That's 100% covered by the 1st Amendment.

The Trump administration hasn't charged these students with anything. It's asserting the right to deport legal immigrants purely based on their political opinions, which is an obvious breach of the 1st Amendment.

[FirmwareBurner]

>None of them did anything even remotely similar to "inciting domestic terrorism" or "vocally support[ing] terrorist groups"

They were political agitators. A visa is a privilege not a right, and may be revoked for any reason, you don't have to commit a crime.

>though the latter would actually be protected by the 1st Amendment

The 1st amendment applies to US citizens, not guests on visas.

Why do you move to a country on a visa and then protest against it? Name me a country who accepts that from its visitors.

A visa to move to a country is a privilege, not a right. If you're protesting the government who gave you that visa and you're not a citizen, then get out, good-bye, nobody wants extra trouble makers, you can legally protest by leaving the country you dislike.

How is this even a conversation? Imagine you invite a guest in your house starting to annoy you the hell out. You'd want them out even though they haven't committed any crimes worth calling the police.

[DiogenesKynikos]

> They were political agitators.

Political agitation is Constitutionally protected in the United States. In fact, it's one of the most important activities that people like Jefferson and Madison wanted to protect.

> A visa is a privilege not a right, and may be revoked for any reason

No, it cannot be revoked for any reason. Revoking visas because of Constitutionally protected speech is a clear violation of the 1st Amendment. The government is not allowed to retaliate against people (not just citizens - anyone) for speech.

> Name me a country who accepts that from its visitors .

Every liberal democracy.

> nobody wants extra trouble makers

Nobody wants fascists, but we're not kicking you out.

> Imagine you invite a guest in your house

This isn't your house. It's the United States of America. There are laws and Constitutional rights. If you don't like it, how about you go somewhere more suited to your tastes - somewhere without freedom of speech and due process.