|
|
|
|
|
|
by gU9x3u8XmQNG
455 days ago
|
|
|
It seems to be a controversial stance, but; I have no issue with this capability in the right hands. I would immediately surrender such information either way, in the interests of the community - say for a missing child? These capabilities should have well defined intent/objectives and transparent controls to protect the privacy of individuals to which are out scope. With all the above said; it’s been proven time and time again that even with clear intent - the purpose of these systems mutates (ie between governments). Said governments then wonder why public trust is lacking? (Example; see Australian Government customer ISP DNS requirements) |
|
|
The problem is that you don't get to decide whose hands it gets into. Even if it's in the right hands today, it might not be tomorrow.
And your definition of "right" might not match someone else's.