[lucianbr]

That's assuming otherwise zero growth, or other nations standing still or stuff like that.

Also, 10 years of constant 5% growth is a lot to ask for in general. Maybe not impossible, but really hard. Now, think that you need to have 5% growth in the first year after the earthquake, in a devastated nation. Infrastructure destroyed, people killed. Lots.

It sounds pretty near to impossible.

These numbers have some meaning you know. It's easy to type "5% growth". Much, much harder to actually achieve it.

How is the dead part of the population being replaced in this scenario? Who is achieving this growth if the population is decimated?

[jeffbee]

I'm not sure about any of these questions, I am just pointing out how wrong it is to suggest that a -60% economic setback is historically fatal. The economy of Myanmar increased 8-fold in the last 30 years.