Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by gunnarmorling 452 days ago
Unless you are on a realtime OS, you may see longer pauses from the OS due to scheduling other processes, so I think it's fair to consider the new low-latency collectors (Shenandoah, ZGC) pauseless from a practical point of view.
1 comments

You can't call GC pauseless if it introduces pauses. We don't say something is free if you have to pay little for it. We say it's cheap.
I think as a technical term, pausless (as used here) has a specific meaning, just like real-time has a specific technical meaning (not literally 0 latency since that's generally physically impossible).