|
|
|
|
|
by rimantas
5071 days ago
|
|
> I think it's a historically common consensus that high
> powered macs are considerably more expensive than their
> equally powered non-mac alternative.
By consensus you mean misconception? I don't remember Macbook Air "clones" being cheaper by $1000. Some are even more expensive.
OTOH, I prefer to use computers, not specs. "Multitouch trackpad" may look the same in specs, but in practice it makes huge difference. |
|
8GB DDR3 1600Mhz RAM
Core i7 3.2Ghz Processor
nVidia 650M
256GB SSD
1920x1080 resolution
My mouse is usually a peripheral.
I would also imagine a clone to cost more than the original anyway, in many cases.