|
|
|
|
|
by carlmr
447 days ago
|
|
IMO C/C++ is not much better, sure, no central package management system, but then people rewrite everything because it's too hard to use a dependency. Now if you do want to use one of the 1000 rewrites of a library, you'll have a lot more checking to do, and integration is still painful. Painless package management is a good thing. Central package repositories without any checking isn't. You don't have to throw away the good because of the bad. |
|
I'm looking at rust, and that it doesn't work well with our package manager (and our rules for review) is one of the big negatives!
Note, if you want to do the above just use Conan. We wrote our package manager before Conan existed, and it isn't worth replacing, but it isn't worth maintaining our own. What is important is that you can enforce your review rules in the package manager not what the package manager is.