[mdaniel]

command-f "license" :-(

I do see <https://github.com/thepartly/gatehouse/blob/v0.1.2/Cargo.tom...> but my experience with package manager license declaration is that it is almost always "yeah, yeah, default, whatever" versus an explicit choice. They are also invisible to the GitHub license widget, which places the burden upon the user to go spelunking around in the code to know for sure

[hardbyte]

I did put licence = "Apache-2.0" in the Cargo.toml but Partly is okay with it being MIT. Update the repo to explicitly add the license text now. Thanks for the call out

[rendaw]

Does cargo have a default license?

[mdaniel]

I guess not? I'm just saying a lot of them do, and inertial is a powerful force that causes many developers to not read ques^h^h^h^hanything

  $ cargo new --verbose abcabc
    Creating binary (application) `abcabc` package
  $ cat abcabc/Cargo.toml
  [package]
  name = "abcabc"
  version = "0.1.0"
  edition = "2024"

  [dependencies]