|
|
|
|
|
by MBCook
5069 days ago
|
|
That's what a company I worked with did, and I thought it was a bad decision. The per-transaction fees are lower, but there is a monthly (or yearly) cost. The API is big because it covers so many cases that you probably won't use. Plus there are fees. Sure, they'll let you do e-checks (every customer wants those, right?), but that's a fee. Return? That's a fee. Chargeback? Fee. Process transactions in real-time instead of a batch at the end of the day? Fee. Log into the web interface? It's free, but it kinda slow and hard to use so you'll waste far more time that you would expect. If you've got a business that does a lot of sales, or sales of very hight dollar items, that kind of thing can really add up. But if your sales are smaller or much more sporadic then the time investment and all the little fees may end up making Stripe cheaper. Sometime an extra 1% more than pays you back in lack of stress. Also, for what it's worth, I remember PayPal, Google Checkout, and Amazon all being roughly the same as Stripe. |
|
We use stripe for everything else we build for clients though, and it's awesome.