[chii]

> What happens when an ambitious young data analyst correlates a gene with criminal activity?

Then such would be a great scientific study to examine, peer review, and replicate to assert if true or not.

If true, wouldnt it make sense to monitor them? May be not go full minority report, but certainly makes it easier to catch.

[mulmen]

> If true, wouldn't it make sense to monitor them?

My point is that there's no reason to believe criminal tendencies are genetic in nature. If they are or aren't it is still easy to identify correlation. To even embark on this dangerous path of research we would need robust guardrails to ensure it doesn't devolve to genocide again.

> May be not go full minority report, but certainly makes it easier to catch.

Makes what easier to catch? How close do you think we should get to Minority Report? My opinion is that we should strive to be as far from Minority Report as possible at all times.

Racism comes from a place of ignorance. It's literally stupid. Genetic data is very easy to misinterpret and human history has no lack of examples of how it can be misused to cause harm to innocent people. Stupid people will misinterpret genetic data the same way they misinterpret skin color or any other physical characteristic.

[shadowgovt]

Ask yourself, honestly, how comfortable you'd be with the idea of the government monitoring you (regardless of how you act, think, or feel) because you have a gene sequence correlated with antisocial activity.

... if, in your deepest heart, you'd be comfortable with that...

... I'd humbly suggest that you may have a genetic condition that makes you a lot more trusting of under-constrained authority surveilling you than the average human being, and you should be sensitive to their genetically-predisposed needs for privacy.