|
|
|
|
|
by BoingBoomTschak
452 days ago
|
|
Same question. One thing I really dislike in Bubblewrap is that I must share the whole net user namespace even if all I want to do is use UNIX domain sockets. Since I only see net options specifying ports, does this handle this use case? |
|
I routinely --unshare-net with UDS ro-binds.
You may be using abstract sockets (@/path/uds.sock) and those do require the same netns I think.