| > You wrote above / I was responding to: I apologize. I read `it's uploading` and misunderstood like you were saying the tool itself was uploading things. > is the preview bad or the resulting polygons? (And the reviewer is bad for approving anything at all?) It can be one, the other, or both. I was replying to a reference about a specific example in the blog post. In that example, I see wobbly features due to rendering alongside the edges that make it look like the polygon is going to have dozens of nodes.
Then, there is an over-simplification of the polygon around the top-right corner (which I didn't consider an error based on my criteria from reviewing manually created pools). > And the reviewer is bad for approving anything at all? I didn't say that. I was trying to assert that the UI/X can be improved to better show what will be uploaded. > but if you're aware of this then it shouldn't have a button that unauthenticated users can press to upload the result to the production database You are right. I was manually reviewing the profile created for the demo every day, but I didn't realize the impact/reach until I saw the first comments here. As soon as I read the first comment, I shut down the demo. As I said in other comments, I will make alternative changes to the demo. > if you want to also demo that part (https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ is a version I found on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/API_v0.6) Thanks for the suggestion, I don't know why I didn't thought about that earlier. |