|
|
|
|
|
by DaiPlusPlus
459 days ago
|
|
...even in a strictly-statically-typed language with a perfectly expressive type-system, it would be unwise to rely _only_ on a "Build succeeded!" message for having confidence in any changes to the system: there's no substitute for well-trodden unit and integration tests for any codebase of nontrivial importance or complexity. |
|
Having types helps the IDE help YOU! That’s my favorite part about types and a strong IDE like Webstorm or IntelliJ. I agree it’s not a substitute for proper testing though.