[mpalmer]

> If, by spending enough tokens, you end up with a working feature, then this is a valid method of doing the work.

It's just several really big ifs:

- Does "no errors" == working feature? Only if the tests are good, and even then...

- Are the tests good? Only if the person overseeing the LLM is checking the thoroughness and quality of the tests; being critical, as you say

- Is the developer willing to be/capable of being critical, or are they using the tooling as a way to avoid such things as much as possible?