|
|
|
|
|
by zajio1am
452 days ago
|
|
Note that 'first' and 'second' are not etymologically related to one or two, but to 'foremost'. Therefore, it is would make sense to use this sequence of ordinals: first, second, twoth, third, fourth, ... or shortened: 0st, 1nd, 2th, 3th, 4th ... |
|