[nkrisc]

Ok, what changes based on which label should apply?

> I take it you don’t think it pointless to have an argument about whether or not something is ‘racist’, for example.

In the abstract, it probably is, unless the point of the argument is to determine whether to make meaningful change. "Are oranges racist?" - pointless. "Is this policy racist, in that it disproportionately affects X minority group?" - meaningful.

Say we all agree this is an example of innovation and not invention - now what? What was the outcome that warranted the argument at all?