|
|
|
|
|
|
by drpossum
462 days ago
|
|
|
> Clojure seems to be a more widely used and active version This is a pretty gross oversimplification and it's also a mischaracterization to say it's "a more widely used and active version". I wouldn't even put it in the same catagory as traditional lisps since those will compile down to executables and clojure run in the JVM |
|
|
They "kind of" do. `:executable t` does not actually make an executable in the way most people understand it. It's a big blob with lots of stuff you would expect to be stripped out in other languages. Short of paying several grand for Lispworks, you are not going to make true executables in something like SBCL.
In contrast, Clojure with GraalVM is fairly easy to do and will give you smaller binaries.