|
|
|
|
|
by blindriver
463 days ago
|
|
You're wrong. The whole point is that the DoA and its ilk like USAID just dumps money and then feigns plausible deniability. Did you see Reed Hoffman's answer when asked if he funds lawfare against RFK Jr so that he both can't add his name to ballots as well as remove them? He said, well I just hand off the money but I can't control what happens after that. Which is utter bullshit. That's plausible deniability in full view. https://x.com/sheislaurenlee/status/1830358688890024386 There can be accountability and there needs to be accountability. If DoA is the enabler of fraud when it pays hundreds of millions of dollars to its NGOs that it knows is engaged in fraud, then USAID is guilty. It can't distribute taxpayer money so easily and say it doesn't have any control over the actions. |
|