| >Parent's comment was the sarcastic observation that if employers ought to be able to verify workers' commutes, they could justifiably also want to monitor other aspects of workers' lives outside of work that have a significant impact on productivity. Was it? Where did you get that idea? Based on their posting history (and I did check before replying just to make sure I wasn't misunderstanding), that they were absolutely serious is most likely. >The argument is valid whilst being entirely dystopian. There is a level of trust, or at least tolerance, between employer and employee that must be accommodated in society; otherwise there is no choice but brutally invasive surveillance of all workers. Absolutely, and I never said anything different. In fact, the bit GP quoted and replied to was: >A fair point, but there are some circumstances where both employee and
employer may need to justify/document such circumstances -- but on the whole,
you're spot on.
Their response was orthogonal to my point. Which made me wonder why. And so I asked.Keep an eye on my userid. If you don't like what I have to say, I strongly suggest you don't read my comments. Have a great day! Edit: Removed poorly supported assertions. |
I, on the other hand, didn't check their posting history, and it looks like you might be right... Poe's Law strikes in reverse, perhaps!