[ENOTTY]

Why would you absolve POTUS when it's clear his administration's policies created the environment that enables CBP officers to take this liberty?

Additionally, the CBP spokesperson[1] defended the action, and despite reporters asking questions, the administration has done nothing to walk back the action or apologize. All signs point to the administration being very okay with stuff like this happening.

[1]: This might not be widely known, but one of the first actions that happens on inauguration day is the replacement of US government agency spokespersons with new political appointees. One of the powers of the executive branch is the bully pulpit and smart administrations seek to use it from day one.

[cryptonector]

I've been watching this sort of thing for decades. Decisions like this by a CBP agent never get overturned by their management, and it never reaches the White House. If what the French researcher wrote was harmless then I would agree with you that this would be a case of policy from the WH causing overreactions below.

[littlestymaar]

> If what the French researcher wrote was harmless then I would agree with you that

How is it not?

[cryptonector]

> > If what the French researcher wrote was harmless then I would agree with you that

> How is it not?

I'd like to remind you that we don't know what it was the they wrote. The news article doesn't specify, and CBP did not provide any details.

[littlestymaar]

> I'd like to remind you that we don't know what it was the they wrote.

The French government has had access to this info before addressing a complaint.