|
|
|
|
|
by eru
462 days ago
|
|
> And we should celebrate it for the civilisational advance that it is, [...] Well, as far as I can tell, it's only in your constitution sort-of by accident. They didn't put this 'advance' in original, it was just the simplest and most face saving way to free the slaves without directly mentioning slaves in the text. (Compare the 3/5 compromise for 'other persons', which also avoids mentioning slaves by that term.) |
|