| Pretty much the same story for me. I have a Motorola, wife insisted on a Pixel costing 3 times as much. I don't see anything like 3 times the value. There are trade offs going both directions: - The most irritating is the Magnetometer and GPS are both better in the Pixel. - The Motorola comes with headphone jacks, dual SIM and SDCard, better battery life. - Fingerprint reader on the Motorola is better. - Both use the Googles phone app, but Google turns off the call recording on Pixels but it works on the Motorola. Go figure. I use that feature when getting avoid from people like the tax office, so that's a hard no go for me. - Cheap Motorola's don't have wireless charging, but USB cables are everywhere, wireless chargers not so much. - I suspect the Pixel's camera is better - but I've never noticed. Add that all up and for me the Motorola is the better phone; at 1/3 the cost of a Pixel. The "unbeatable value" claim in the headline did cause an eyebrow twitch. |