|
|
|
|
|
|
by fads_go
463 days ago
|
|
|
> I don't know how you'd improve on the former. For a lot of it there simply isn't any sound theoretical foundation, so you just end up with flimsy post-hoc rationalizations. So great science would come up with a sound theoretical foundation, or at least strong arguments as to why no such foundation can exist. |
|
|