| It seems we are pushed into major conflicts and disruptions so we have to decentralise it as much as possible. The current model is very awkward, we have been pushed into those very centralised, hyperscale solution that most businesses and individual do not really need.
Most businesses do not really need much to do their job. We are probably gonna have major connectivity disruptions on of those days or what happened when your Hertzner or Orange/Huawei datacenter is down?
And I know they have "better security" but if we are attacked they are gonna be taken down anyway. We do not wanna look at what a major cyber disruption would do to our societies. I believe just the consequences on the electricity grid and hospitals would make us wave the white flags in a few weeks. You wanna own your hardware because if there are disruptions it is gonna be hard to get your hand on some because of supply, logistics or just monetary disruptions. How hard is it technically to setup something like Ubuntu Microcloud [0] for your own use or local businesses you provide that service for? From my experience the biggest risk and headache is all those EU regulations like the EU Cyper resilience Act and in some cases energy costs. So when Ursula tell you Europe needs to prepare for war and authorise/push your country to go into even more debt so her friends can build expensive tanks that will never see a battle it is ridiculous. They should focus on removing all the obstacle to resilience they setup themselves, find a way to reduce energy costs (pretty hard now...) and maybe encourage moving out of those big tech cloud (starting by doing it themselves). - [0] https://canonical.com/microcloud |
>so her friends can build expensive tanks that will never see a battle
I am not sure how you consolidate the two statements. It seems to me that there is a very real risk of armed conflict in Europe over the next decade.