| thanks for taking time to write a feedback :) > That's a false contradistinction: Redis is also disk persisted. The performance gain mentioned was vs. Redis in memory. so we weren't claiming that Redis can't be persisted (which of course it can), but we were saying that Redis without persistence (which performs faster that with persistence) was still this much slower than HPKV with persistence.
But you're correct that we probably should have been more clear in explaining this :) >Did you just benchmarked against only single Redis instance and claimed performance win? Signle node of Redis vs. Single node of HPKV. so it's an apples to apples comparison >Even if so, how do benchmarks compare against source-available competitor DragonflyDB? Benchmark with DragonFly coming soon :) sorry about lack of that information in documentation, we'll update that. for for now, the durability guarantee on Pro is 30 seconds. on Business with HA is 5 minutes. |
From the redis comment it sounds like the way to scale a redis node is to increase the size and run multiple instances in parallel.
Saying it's "apples to apples" would be like setting the thread limit to a competitor to 1, then saying it's a fair benchmark.