|
|
|
|
|
by vanderZwan
456 days ago
|
|
Related: in a reaction to a comment I wrote about logarithms about a month ago[0], saulpw recently linked his own idea of making logarithms more "accessible" to the masses by introducing magnitude-based notation: https://saul.pw/mag/ I think it is a really nice idea that should be spread more widely. It might be Pi day, and while I traditionally complain that Tau is better for contrarian reasons (hey at least I'm honest), we might as well co-opt the extra attention maths gets for other mathematical causes. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43036094 |
|
There's a reason we use scientific notation, and it's actually partly because in the era of slide-rules, it was INCREDIBLY helpful notation that makes it trivial to estimate things like order of magnitude. People performed all manner of operations and kept the magnitude part in their head. It MADE people more magnitude aware.
This magnitude-only based notation is the one that's actually more needlessly complex and error prone. There's no sensible way to manage significant figures or rounding error in simple operations like addition and subtraction. And simple operations, like adding/subtracting two numbers are really non-trivial. If you have to start each operation by converting to a useful format and then converting back, what have you gained exactly by using the notation?