| The problem with enforcing resellability on digital goods is the technical ability to copy them. If I have full ownership of a digital good, then I have the ability to copy it. Any limitation of my ability to copy requiring removing some control from the owner and escrowing it with another party (e.g. DRM). As much as I hate to say it, allowing digital good resale is a good use for a blockchain: uniquely identifying an instance and then keeping a decentralized ledger of who owns it at any time. However, there would still need to be a carrot to make this system attractive. If there isn't, then why wouldn't people just create infinite copies off-ledger and ignore it? And without any viable digital goods ownership system, who wouldn't companies default to the current model of only offering licenses / subscriptions? |
I assume plenty of people are willing to pay for things they appreciate. Maybe the carrot can be some kind of recognition: you get to make a digital signature from that token that you can display as a part of your digital identity. There could be discussion forums that require you to have such a token to participate in.