|
|
|
|
|
by Nevermark
457 days ago
|
|
Yes, I would go the opposite in terms of simplicity. Parse once for syntax and symbol definition, 2nd pass over parsed structure to link symbol references to their definitions. Two uncomplicated passes. That handles a general code graph - so the language can go anywhere, and never be fundamentally held up by limitations of early syntax/parsing decisions. |
|