|
|
|
|
|
by mrangle
462 days ago
|
|
I'll be clearer and repost theirs. >The most common ancestry in the US is German, not English, but English is still the dominant language. Language isn't DNA. Their specific point is that "language isn't DNA". To support that argument they note that Continental German immigrants to America now speak English. My specific point is that English originates not only within the language family of German speaking peoples, but that it originated with the DNA pools that comprise Northern Germany. Therefore, I don't see how "the Germans are speaking English" makes the point that language isn't DNA. I'm not saying that it is, at all. Its very obviously not. But the example being argued didn't make that point. |
|
Your objection is that English is a Germanic language. That's interesting, but irrelevant here. German and English are two different languages that are mutually unintelligible, and the fact that immigrants went from speaking one to speaking the other within a few generations illustrates my point that language does not have to (and often doesn't) follow genetics.
It's not only German immigrants to the US who now speak English. Pretty much all immigrants to the US speak English after 1-2 generations, regardless of what language they originally spoke.