[pc86]

Surely you're talking about a District Attorney deciding that an individual needs to be charged prima facie and saying he "will find a crime" right?

[amanaplanacanal]

I expect that's not what they were talking about, but I bet what you are talking about can happen just about anywhere.

[pc86]

I'm sure it could and it's wrong everywhere.

[throwaway894345]

District Attorneys everywhere charge first and then prove the crime afterwards, right?

[pc86]

Well typically a case is referred to them by law enforcement or a criminal complaint, then they review the evidence and decide whether or not to go to trial.

It's much rarer for a DA to say they want to find crimes a particular person committed and then direct others to go find evidence for whatever they can find evidence for.

[throwaway894345]

Which DA went after a particular person without referral by law enforcement or a criminal complaint? If this was really such a breach of ethics, surely it would be trivial for the political party in question to first make a criminal complaint? It's not obvious to me that the complaint/referral matters much?