[djyde]

Sorry, no. I'm an indie developer so I wish I can make some money with it. It would be a fair price as I wrote on landing page, will less than $20/year.

But I can share the tech stack I use:

- WXT: the browser extension framework

- Vercel AI SDK. Both SDK core and SDK UI. I wrote a bridge that I can proxy the api request to background script which compat with the SDK streaming protocol, so that I can use the SDK UI.

- Next.js: for the landing page and the up coming cloud service (e.g. prompt sync)

- Strapi: headless cms.

[richin13]

Fair enough. I asked because an extension like this has access to too much information which I don't like from a privacy stand point.

Thanks for sharing though!

[djyde]

I understand your concern. I think "access to much information" means this extension require <all_url> host_permission, which I don't want to either but it must.

Because custom AI provider's API base url is submit by user. If I want to call the API on background script, this base url must be listed on host_permissions. Otherwise it will cause a CORS problem.

optional_host_permissions may fix this problem, but since the base url is set by user, it's not possible to use this workaround.

Any suggestion?

[tough]

you could give paying customers access to the code to run themselves (not open source)

if that works for you/your privacy-aware customer they can inspect the code/build it/ run their own version

[djyde]

Actually, the nice thing about chrome extensions is that users can view all requests made by content_script and background script through devtool. This is much more intuitive than checking the code.

[Ylpertnodi]

>will less than $20/year.

I'd rather pay more, once, than another* subscription.

*Of which, I have reduced to two: phone plan [€5.99pcm], and mullvad [€5.00pcm].

No more.