[sussmannbaka]

> going after drugdealers is something I support

weasel words. If you are going to publicly support extrajudicial mass murder, say so.

[suraci]

looks like a slippery slope?

[redeeman]

> mass murder

so you admit the drugdealers are a massive amount of people?

anyway, you are assuming there is any justice to be found in the "justice" system. In a very ideal world, I would choose differently, but you have to look at the whole picture, and then the perfect solution is generally quite far from what you have to deal with

[sussmannbaka]

I don’t admit anything of the sort. They committed extrajudicial mass murder. Are the ones they killed drug dealers? Criminals? Random passersby? Without a proper trial you can’t tell.

The death penalty is already bad WITH proper trials, since judges can always get it wrong but this isn’t even that. Put differently, the way you are arguing for it would enable anyone to kill you in cold blood and later claim you had it coming.