[gizmov21]

Made an account just to say that I respectfully disagree solely when it comes to accounting and supply chain processes in an enterprise ERP. Unwinding un-auditable processes costs so much f’ing time and money while the business still has to run that I’ve found it to be cheaper and better to be auditable from day 1, in this one specific instance.

[Tostino]

I built one of the Trade Promotion Management platforms used in the NA market, and couldn't agree more. It's a nightmare trying to be auditable if you didn't think about it from the start.

[gizmov21]

I was at (insert infamous unicorn) and they spent a ton of money (all relative, the money meant nothing) but more importantly 18 months attempting to get SOX compliant and never made it, because running the business was too important. Of course it all came down to lack of leadership to enforce policies but even if we had it, it was objectively super fucking challenging.

When I do get a chance to implement compliant processes at the beginning, it’s one of those amazing IT things where we prevent WW3 but never get the credit for it.

[bri3d]

There’s being auditABLE and being auditED. Honestly I think the article’s take is smarter for a less experienced or skilled founding team and tptacek’s is better for a more experienced team. Paying auditors to look at screenshots and CSVs is a giant waste of money until it’s not, but at the same time, letting bad practice ossify until it’s expensive to remove is also a mistake.

[gizmov21]

Yea agreed, my comment was more of a sidenote than a direct response.