No, what you posted was flamebait: a rant against “academics” (all of them?) presented without evidence by a brand new account. This is just calling it out.
I laid out how globalism was pushed by the economic academic consensus as the enlightened approach to international relation with China.
I said that it has clearly failed to advance US interests over the past 30+ years and resulted in the decimation of the working class in America and hollowing out of the economy.
I don't think that's a rant, nor argument without evidence.
Maybe try explaining how academics strong armed capital into deindustrializing and you’d get a better response.
The fact you went right to rules lawyering shows your weak position.