[kaoD]

To clarify why it's actually not that ambiguous: TS is not (and does not have) a runtime at all. Even TS-first runtimes like Deno are (1) not TS but its own thing and most importantly (2) just JS engines with a frontend layer that treats TS as a first-class citizen (in Deno's case, V8).

It's hard to tell if there will even be a runtime that somehow uses TS types to optimize even further (e.g. by proving that a function diverges) but to my knowledge they currently don't and I don't think there's any in the works (or if that's even possible while maintaining runtime soundness, considering you can "lie" to TS by casting to `unknown` and then back to any other type).

[dec0dedab0de]

“faster typescript” would also be a valid way to say the typescript compiler found a way to automatically write more performant javascript.

Just like if you said faster C++ that could mean the compiler runs faster, or the resulting machine code runs faster.

Just because the compile target is another human readable language doesn’t mean it ceases to be a typescript program.

I didn’t think this particular example was very ambiguous because a general 10x speed up in the resulting JS would be insane, and I have used typescript enough to wish the compiler was faster. Though if we’re being pedantic, which I enjoy doing sometimes, I would say it is ambiguous.

[jakelazaroff]

> “faster typescript” would also be a valid way to say the typescript compiler found a way to automatically write more performant javascript.

That still wouldn't make sense, in the same way that it wouldn't make sense to say "Python type hints found a way to automatically write more performant Python". With few exceptions, the TypeScript compiler doesn't have any runtime impact at all — it simply removes the type annotations, leaving behind valid JavaScript that already existed as source code. In fact, avoiding runtime impact is an explicit design goal of TypeScript [1].

They've even begun to chip away at the exceptions with the `erasableSyntaxOnly` flag [2], which disables features like enums that do emit code with runtime semantics.

[1] https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/TypeScript-Desi...

[2] https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/release-notes/t...

[jessekv]

> Python type hints found a way to automatically write more performant Python

I get your point, but... this is exactly the premise of mypyc ;)

[pcthrowaway]

But typescript isn't a minifier or an optimizer. No part of typescript compiles it to anything that looks significantly different (besides enums).

Sure, lots of build tools do this, but that's not Typescript.

With very few exceptions, Typescript is written so that removing the Typescript-specific things makes it equivalent to the Javascript it transpiles to.

[pseudopersonal]

Thanks for the clarification. For those of us who don't use TypeScript day to day, I feel that it is ambigious. Without clicking the link, you wouldn't know if it's about a compiler or a runtime. What if they announced a bun competitor?

https://betterstack.com/community/guides/scaling-nodejs/node....

[fastball]

Those are javascript runtimes, not TypeScript runtimes. The point stands.

If you don't know enough about TypeScript to understand that TypeScript is not a runtime, I'm not sure why you would care about TypeScript being faster (in either case).

[Izkata]

I thought the title was announcing someone created a Typescript runtime. It is misleading.

Preact was "a faster React", for example.

[zem]

if typescript code execution got that much faster it might be a reason for someone to look into the language even if they knew nothing about it.

[timeflex]

There are plenty of other reasons to consider TypeScript, but again, what code execution are referring to? The V8 JavaScript engine?

[zem]

that's not the point I was making - gp was wondering why someone who didn't even know typescript compiled to javascript and ran atop a javascript engine would care that it had gotten 10x faster.

[alabastervlog]

From the title, my initial assumption was someone wrote a compiler & runtime for typescript that doesn't target javascript, which was very exciting. And I do work with typescript.

[internetter]

> Without clicking the link, you wouldn't know if it's about a compiler or a runtime

I mean I think generally you’d want to click the link and read the article before commenting

[depr]

It has become a sport here to criticize titles for not explaining any random thing the commenter doesn't know. Generally these things are either in the article or they are very easily findable with a single web search.

[jilles]

If you have to explain why something is not ambiguous it is by definition ambiguous.

[hoten]

Maybe they aren't the audience. I don't see how this is ambiguous to anyone that actually uses typescript

[01HNNWZ0MV43FF]

It was ambiguous to me. I've used TS a few times over the years, so I thought "native TypeScript compiler" meant AOT TS, not a TS compiler written in Go

[owebmaster]

deno runs typescript and it won't run 10x faster. It is ambiguous.

[dwaltrip]

It seems Deno compiles typescript to JS just like everyone else.

https://docs.deno.com/runtime/fundamentals/typescript/

[totallykvothe]

No. Ambiguous means that a statement has many possible meanings, not simply that something might be confusing.

[refulgentis]

I'm a bit confused:

- It's not ambiguous because they mean $X.

- It is ambiguous because it has many possible meanings.

- It is not ambiguous because it has many possible meanings

[jzackpete]

that would imply the existence of an objective authority on the meaning of the statement, which is debatable

[pzo]

there is static hermes from Meta that do AoT compilation to native so I find it actually ambiguous. For a second I thought they did a compiler instead of transpile r.

[maxloh]

> It's hard to tell if there will even be a runtime that somehow uses TS types to optimize even further.

Yeah, that exists. AssemblyScript has an AOT compiler that generates binaries from statically typed code.

[crabmusket]

AssemblyScript is a very limited subset of the language though.

[seanmcdirmid]

> It's hard to tell if there will even be a runtime that somehow uses TS types to optimize even further

Typescript's type system is unsound so it probably will never be very useful for an optimizing compiler. That was never the point of TS however.

[xanth]

Unfortunately many TS users have a surface level understanding of TS leading them to believe that TS is "real"

[pas]

I use TS a lot and still assumed they are embarking on a native runtime/compiler whatever epic journey.