|
|
|
|
|
|
by re-thc
466 days ago
|
|
|
> And we will get to the point that we both agree it's just our interpretations of facts. You're trying to prove something with a much higher requirement than mine. Where are the facts to begin with? I'm saying it's "not" what they voted for, the equivalent of trying to prove "not guilty". So as long as there are suspicions that's easily done. What you're trying to prove is that everyone is "guilty", which is a lot harder, e.g. you'd need a high majority in court. > I live among such people.
> These are 2 examples out of dozens. i.e. your reply is you live potentially in a bubble that might not even be statistically enough to prove any point and because of that you've concluded. So if my friends at school all buy the same game, somewhere this game is popular in my country or even the world? For all I know it could only be my school or my state. E.g. many US states swing differently. |
|
|