[joshuaissac]

> What else would you like to see? A legal analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the case?

Exactly.

What are the facts of the case according to the plaintiff? What are the points of law being relied on?

Does the IA dispute the plaintiff's version of the facts and the interpretation of the law? If so, what points are they disputing?

If there have been similar cases, how did those cases go, and how were they different to this case?