|
|
|
|
|
by 3np
472 days ago
|
|
Er, no. In this sense IPFS is just a transport protocol. Hosting illegal metarial over it is not inherently safer than doing the same over e.g. Bittorrent. It's enough to go after the endpoints. Which is actually easier than with HTTP or Bittorrent because it is really hard to properly proxy and run IPFS without inadvertently leaking metadata. Being able to run IPFS anonymously over e.g. Tor has in the past been referred to as an anti-goal by maintainers[0]. In practice today even that's probably not necessary, just go after the top 5 or so public http bridges like dweb.link and cf... [0]: Anyone aware of alternative implementations or forks with a different stance on this? |
|