Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Someone 471 days ago
> The US can probably consider most-all ARM IP to be dual use technology and immediately deny use of it.

The US (certainly the current US) can do that, but (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arm_Holdings):

“Arm Holdings plc (formerly an acronym for Advanced RISC Machines and originally Acorn RISC Machine) is a Japanese-owned British semiconductor and software design company based in Cambridge, England”

2 comments

There are still ARM offices in the US in which their work, IP, etc would be subject to export restrictions.
ARM in stock listed in New York, it cant avoid US assertions
So what, there's nothing done in America that can't be brought back to Cambridge or London just as easily as we offshored it.

If Europe is making a serious investment then it has more than enough power to say "you'll get the contract if you divest of X,Y,Z"