|
|
|
|
|
by typesanitizer
462 days ago
|
|
Hi, author here. I'm a big fan of Armstrong's work, I've watched several of his talks multiple times and always get something new out of them even if I don't agree entirely. :) I do mention Erlang near the start of the post, around the 360 word mark: > Joe Armstrong’s talk The Do’s and Don’ts of Error Handling: Armstrong covers the key requirements for handling and recovering from errors in distributed systems, based on his PhD thesis from 2003 (PDF) [sidenote 3]. > [sidenote 3] By this point in time, Armstrong was about 52 years old, and had 10+ years of experience working on Erlang at Ericsson. > Out of the above, Armstrong’s thesis is probably the most holistic, but it’s grounding in Erlang means that it also does not take into account one of the most widespread forms of static analysis we have today – type systems |
|
Given how prevalent just reading the headline -> immediately posting a preconceived take is, most information is probably communicated through the top comments these days.