Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by throwaway657656 474 days ago
Imagine if Fort Knox had a magic key allowing the bearer to walk in and out of it, at will, with as much riches as they wanted.

Now imagine that bearer is a politician who blames the North Korea for the missing assets.

Or imagine that key is damaged and no one can get the coins. It is lost forever.

I almost hope this stupid experiment is done on a state level, rather than national, and that it fails miserably as cautionary tale.

3 comments

I assume you haven't heard of m-of-n multi-signature vaults?
ByBit heard of n-of-m.
Shame they trusted information they read in a web browser rather than verifying it on an independent offline device....

The average bitcoiner pleb with a single air-gapped signing device has better security.

It was a rookie error, helped by the overly complex nature of Ethereum.

That's my point. It reminds me of when the greatest smart contract writers in the world got "hacked" by what was in the retrospect, a rookie error. We now have ETH and ETC which no one at the time (I'm a former miner) would have thought was possible.
"Smart" != common sense.

K.I.S.S., especially when it comes to money.

Tick tock, next block...

Laundering it would be very difficult. NK can do it because they have a nation state that will protect them. That's the only way to be able to spend that money. So sure steak the keys and live a life of luxury in north Korea I guess.
Unfortunately, there are plenty of DEX's that will launder your bitcoin of questionable providence into completely untraceable Monero.
Or Russia or Belarus or Georgia.
Imagine you could actually know if Fort Knox had what you thought it did, to the bar.