|
|
|
|
|
by spr-alex
471 days ago
|
|
i think the opposite, the error accumulation thing is basically the daily experience of using LLMs. As for the premise that models cant self correct that's not the argument i've ever seen, transformers have global attention across the context window. It's that their prediction abilities are increasingly poor as generation goes on. Is anyone having a different experience than that? Everyone doing some form of "prompt engineering" whether with optimized ML tuning, whether with a human in the loop, or some kind of agentic fine tuning step, runs into perplexity errors that get worse with longer contexts in my opinion. There's some "sweet spot" for how long of a prompt to use for many use cases, for example. It's clear to me that less is more a lot of the time Now will diffusion fare significantly better on error is another question. Intuition would guide me to think more flexiblity with token-rewriting should enable much greater error correction capabilities. Ultimately as different approaches come online we'll get PPL comparables and the data will speak for itself |
|