|
|
|
|
|
by lkrubner
473 days ago
|
|
Nate Silver has shifted his politics very far to the right. That's simply a fact. He used to do reports on polling in which his math was straightforward and very reasonable, and back around 2016 he gave the public a good education about what probability actually meant -- in particular, he performed a real service by reminding people that "a 66% chance of winning" does not mean a person is going to win, it actually means one-third of the time they will lose. But nowadays Nate Silver argues on Twitter in favor of whatever Peter Thiel is doing, even as Peter Thiel endorses a completely illegal coup aimed at destroying the USA. |
|
Link to such tweets? I've gone through two pages of his most recent tweets and couldn't find anything obviously matches "argues on Twitter in favor of whatever Peter Thiel is doing, even as Peter Thiel endorses a completely illegal coup aimed at destroying the USA". The closest I could find were
"Don't neglect how tedious this platform is becoming. Democrats "won" the battle of being the most annoying party for several years running, but their grip on the title will probably be broken soon."
and a series of tweets talking about how smart Musk is.
Is that what you meant by "very far to the right"? Is not being infinitely rabid against Trump/Vance/Musk count as "very far to the right" now?