|
|
|
|
|
by aaplok
472 days ago
|
|
> This is a fault of the distros. At some point keeping niche software will cause issues and conflicts. I am not sure I agree with this argument. This gives a vibe of "make place for me, away with the old guard!" What if someone called their program "vi" with the argument that noone uses vi anymore? Besides, who decides what is niche and what isn't? Is a program like lynx which offers better accessibility features than mainstream browsers not worth distributing because it's niche? Blaming the distros for already having software named like what you decide to call yours isn't terribly cooperative. Figurative "you" of course, not meaning OP here. |
|
Everyone and their brother knows what "vi" is. Many (presumably millions) use it.
How many people would know what Lynx is. My guess is very few.
> Is a program like lynx which offers better accessibility features than mainstream browsers not worth distributing because it's niche?
Its trivial to understand why this is a bad argument (appeal to emotion)