|
|
|
|
|
|
by robwwilliams
472 days ago
|
|
|
Most puzzling and naive claim here: “Given the relative ease of sabotaging a destabilizing AI project—through interventions ranging from covert cyberattacks to potential kinetic strikes on datacenters—MAIM already describes the strategic picture AI superpowers find themselves in.” Can some explain what they mean? 1. I assume it would be relatively practical for a nation-state or even a mid-sized company (xAI) to air-gap an installation for AGI development. 2. I assume any AGI would be replicable on a platform costing less than $100,000. And upgradable securely by wire or over air. Sorry, but MAIM is LAME. |
|
|
Stuxnet. (Or just sabotage a shipment of GPUs.)