|
|
|
|
|
by Earw0rm
478 days ago
|
|
It's about combinations of skills. 0.01%ers in one field tend towards monomaniacal obsession. Sometimes that's useful. But having mostly depth, and enough breadth to balance it out, is better in most cases than depth only. People who are all breadth, no depth are worse. Those traits give you MBAs and politicians. That doesn't mean breadth is inherently bad, it's about balance. The sweet-spot is typically to get inside the top 1% and get 75th or 90th percentile people skills or communication skills. Those can take a lot of different forms, good writers / managers / youtubers / teachers are all in that class but there's not necessarily that much overlap. |
|