|
|
|
|
|
|
by pj_mukh
477 days ago
|
|
|
Jesus. On top of your analysis of commands that might flag conflicting commands, shouldn't we also be analyzing the radar to make sure there aren't any obviously conflicting paths? I saw your comment about pilot intentionality being the major time-saver but in a situation like the Potomac River crash, the intentionality and knowledge may have been a unintentional headfake for a system like yours i.e "Yes I see the CRJ". Maybe it's 80-20 for you, with the Potomac situation being especially rare. |
|
|
Your general point is 100% correct. It's not enough to only do the command parsing; you have to also compare that to radar + trajectory planning to get the full picture. That's exactly what we're working on now. Fortunately, the radar piece is much more deterministic.