[MathMonkeyMan]

> The CDC website was gutted in Jan 2025

I trust that this is true, but a cursory browsing through 2024 outbreaks, for example, shows the same information.

To your parent poster's point, it would be nice to have a damning example like "look at this thing that was taken down." Maybe such examples belong somewhere else, but it might help dissuade skeptics.

[apical_dendrite]

Please see pages 6 to 12 in this declaration from the court case for examples of what was taken down. Note that Judge Bates issued a temporary restraining order to the CDC to restore these websites, so it shouldn't look different (except that the CDC put a ridiculous disclaimer on some of the pages) https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69608613/6/1/doctors-fo... [edit - fixed link]

[MathMonkeyMan]

Thanks. That document is four pages. Where is the "Memorandum of Law in Support of the Motion for a Restraining Order" referred to at the beginning?

edit:

- “The Youth Risk Behavioral Surveillance System”

- “Data and Statistics” for “Adolescent and School Health”

- “The Social Vulnerability Index”

- “The Environmental Justice Index”

- “PrEP for the Prevention of HIV Infection in the U.S.: 2021 Guideline Summary”

- “HIV Monitoring”

- “Getting Tested for HIV”

- “National ART Surveillance System (NASS)”

- “CDC Contraceptive Guidance for Health Care Providers”

- FDA webpages on “Study of Sex Differences in the Clinical Evaluation of Medical Products”

- “Diversity Action Plans to Improve Enrollment of Participants from Underrepresented Populations in Clinical Studies”

[1]: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.277...

[phonon]

I think it's within Document 6 (Feb 6)

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69608613/doctors-for-am...

[apical_dendrite]

Apologies. I've fixed the link.